FREE TOOL · MODEL-ASSISTED · ONE READ
We check homepage and likely supporting pages for E-E-A-T cues, then return practical signal verdicts (good/partial/missing) without any numeric score.
No account. One bounded check — never the full crawl or a site-wide score.
WHAT YOU GET
ILLUSTRATIVEHTTPS + organization identityGood
Author bylinesMissing
Contact routePartial
Verdicts with reasons — not a score.
E-E-A-T — experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness — is the frame quality raters and, increasingly, AI systems use to decide whether your site is worth believing. This check fetches your homepage and up to two likely supporting pages, runs the deterministic layer first (HTTPS, organization identity, contact details, schema presence), then one bounded model review of the visible signals. You get per-signal verdicts — good, partial, missing — with the reason, not a number.
For search, E-E-A-T is the quality-rating frame your pages are evaluated within, especially anywhere money or health is involved. For AI answers it's more direct: engines deciding which source to cite prefer sources whose authorship and identity check out. These signals are also the rare part of SEO fully in your control — no algorithm has to cooperate for you to add an author page.
The full audit checks 27 E-E-A-T signals across your crawled pages on a schedule — each shown present or absent with the evidence sentence that decided it, unmeasured ones marked pending, and the seam between checked and scored kept visible. This quick check is one layer of that inventory.
Convinced? It takes one URL.
TRY ANOTHER CHECK
No, on purpose. You get practical verdicts per signal — good, partial, or missing — with what is actually visible on your pages behind each one. A single E-E-A-T number would imply a precision that nobody, including Google, publishes.
Not directly. Experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust come from Google's quality-rater guidelines — the framework human raters use to judge result quality — and they describe what good looks like rather than a switch in the ranking system. The checks here are for signals a reader or a rater could verify on your pages.
Up to three: your homepage, plus up to two likely supporting pages it finds from your own links — the about, contact or policy-shaped ones. It checks HTTPS, organisation identity, contact details and schema presence, then runs one bounded model review of the visible trust signals.
Evidence a person could check: who runs the site, how to reach them, whether authorship and credentials are stated, whether claims carry sources, and whether the technical trust basics are in place. Signals it cannot see are reported as missing evidence, not as bad faith.
No. It is rate-limited rather than gated — a handful of runs per hour from one address — because each one costs a model call.
The audit checks 27 E-E-A-T signals across your crawled inventory, dates every one, keeps them as history, and feeds most of them into your score. This is a fast read of one site's front door, with no score attached at all.